All Issue

2022 Vol.35, Issue 4 Preview Page
A Study on the Improvement of Types and Grades of Forest Wetland through Correlation Analysis of Forest Wetland Evaluation Factors and Types

산림습원 가치평가 요소와 유형 및 등급의 상관성 분석을 통한 산림습원 유형 구분 및 등급의 개선 방안 연구

Jong-Won Lee1
,
Ho-Geun Yun2
,
Kyu Song Lee3
,
Jong Bin An4*
이 종원1
,
윤 호근2
,
이 규송3
,
안 종빈4*
1Post-doc, DMZ Botanic Garden, Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu 24564, Korea
2Research Fellow, DMZ Botanic Garden, Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu 24564, Korea
3Professor, Department of Biology, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea
4Researcher, DMZ Botanic Garden, Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu 24564, Korea
1국립수목원 DMZ산림생물자원보전과, 박사연구원,
2국립수목원 DMZ산림생물자원보전과, 연구원
3강릉원주대학교 생물학과, 교수
4국립수목원 DMZ산림생물자원보전과, 임업연구사
*Corresponding Author
1 August 2022. pp. 471-501
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

This study was carried out on 455 forest wetlands of south Korea for which an inventory was established through value evaluation and grade. Correlation analysis was conducted to find out the correlation between the types and grades of forest wetlands and 23 evaluation factors in four categories: vegetation and landscape, material circulation and hydraulics･hydrology, humanities and social landscape, and disturbance level. Through the improvement of types and grades of forest wetlands, it is possible to secure basic data that can be used in setting up conservation measures by preparing standards necessary for future forest wetland conservation and restoration, and to found a systematic monitoring system. First, between the type of forest wetland and size and accessibility showed a positive correlation, but the remaining items were analyzed to have negative or no correlation. In particular, it was found that there was no negative correlation or no correlation with the grades of forest wetland. Moreover, it was found that there was a very strong negative correlation with the weighted four category items. Thus, it is judged that improvement is necessary because there is an error in the weight or adjust the evaluation criteria of the value evaluation item, add an item that can increase objectivity. Especially, in the case of forest wetlands, the ecosystem service function due to biodiversity is the largest, so evaluation items should be improved in consideration of this. Therefore, it can be divided into five categories: uniqueness and rarity (15%), wildlife habitat (15%), vegetation and landscape (35%), material cycle･hydraulic hydrology (30%), and humanities and social landscape (5%). It will be possible to propose weights that can increase effectiveness.

Keywords
Correlation analysis
Evaluation factors
Forest wetland
Grade
Type
Wight
References
1
Ahn, K.H., J.C. Lim, Y.K. Lee, T.B. Choi, K.S. Lee, M.S. Im, Y.H. Go, J.H. Suh, Y.K. Shin and M.J. Kim. 2016a. Vegetation classification and distributional pattern in Damyang river in wetland. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 25(2):89-102 (in Korean). 10.14249/eia.2016.25.2.89
2
Ahn, K.S., H.S. Kim and J.G. Kim. 2016b. Wetlands. Life Science, Seoul, Korea. pp. 1-604 (in Korean).
3
Burkett, V. and J. Kusler. 2000. Climate change: potential impacts and interactions in wetlands of The United States 1. JAWARA. 36(2):313-320. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04270.x
4
Carpenter, S.R., S.G. Fisher, N.B. Grimm and J.F. Kitchell. 1992. Global change and freshwater ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 23(1):119-139. 10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.001003
5
Chatterjee, A., E. Blom, B. Gujja, R. Jacimovic, L. Beevers, J. O’Keeffe, M. Beland and T. Biggs. 2010. WWF initiatives to study the impact of climate change on Himalayan high-altitude wetlands (HAWs). Mountain Res. Dev. 30(1):42-52. 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00091.1
6
Choung, Y.S., B.M. Kim, K.S. Lee, K.H. Cho, K.Y. Joo, J.O. Hyun, H.R. Na, H.K. Oh, G.H. Nam and J.S. Kim. 2020. Wetland Preference and Life Form of the Vascular Plants in the Korean Peninsula. National Institute of Biological Resources. Incheon, Korea. pp. 1-235 (in Korean). 10.1186/s41610-021-00183-0
7
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. (USA). pp. 1-104. 10.5962/bhl.title.4108
8
Cylinder, P.D. and K.M. Bogdan. 1995. Wetlands Regulation: a Complete Guide of Federal and California Programs. Solano Press Books, CA (USA). pp. 35-88.
9
Dahl, T.E. 2011. Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States 2004 to 2009. U.S. Department of the Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. (USA). pp. 1-108.
10
Erwin, K.L. 2009. Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 17(1):71-84. 10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1
11
Gu, B.H. 2002. A Study on the Classification and Mapping Methods of Wetlands in Korea. Department of Landscape Architecture, Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National Univ., Korea. pp. 1-161 (in Korean).
12
Johnson, W.C., B. Werner, G. Guntenspergen, R. Voldseth, R.A. Millett, B. Naugle, D.E. Tulbure, M. Carroll, R.W.H.J. Tracy and C. Olawsky. 2010. Prairie wetland complexes as landscape functional units in a changing climate. BioScience 60(2):128-140. 10.1525/bio.2010.60.2.7
13
Jung, S.Y., J.W. Lee, H.T. Shin, S.J. Kim, J.B. An, T.I. Heo, J.M. Chung and Y.C. Cho. 2017. Invasive Alien Plants in South Korea. Korea National Arboretum. Pocheon, Korea. pp. 1-265 (in Korean)
14
Kim, T.S., J.W. Kim, S.K. Moon, H.S. Yang and B.G. Yang. 2013. Introduction to national mid-term fundamental plan for wetlands conservation and management. J. Wet. Res. 15(4):519-527 (in Korean). 10.17663/JWR.2013.15.4.519
15
Korea Forest Service. 2006. Report of Wetlands Research. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Korea. pp. 1-491 (in Korean).
16
Korea Forest Service. 2021. Annual Report on Forestry and Forestry Trends in 2020. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Korea. pp. 1- 692 (in Korean).
17
Korea National Arboretum. 2016. 2016 Statistical of Forest Wetland. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Korea. pp. 1-290 (in Korean).
18
Korea National Arboretum. 2019. Checklist of Alien Plants in Korea. Dooroo Happy Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea. pp. 1-225 (in Korean).
19
Korea National Arboretum. 2021. Checklist of Vascular Plants in Korea. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Korea. pp. 1-1006 (in Korean).
20
Kwon, D.H. 2006. Results of the research on Korea’s wetlands and tasks. Journal of the Geomorphological Association of Korea 13(1):25-34 (in Korean).
21
Lee, J.W., J.B. An, S.H. Kang and H.G. Yun. 2022a. A study on the flora of outstanding forest wetlands in the eastern part of Jeonnam province. Korean J. Plant Res. 35(1):134-167 (in Korean).
22
Lee, J.W., J.B. An, T.Y. Hwang and H.G. Yun. 2022b. A study on classification of forest wetlands types and inventory establishment in Korea. J. Wet. Res. 24(1):1-24 (in Korean).
23
Ministry of Environment. 2020. The 4 Intensive Survey on National Inland Wetlands(’20). National Institute of Ecology. Seocheon, Korea. pp. 1-516 (in Korean).
24
Ministry of Environment. 2022. The Wetlands Conservation Act. (accessed on 27 February 2022). https://www.law.go.kr.
25
Mitsch and Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands (3rd ed.), John Wiley & Sons. NY (USA). pp. 1-900.
26
Moon, H.S. 2006. The Identification and comprehension of the mountain wetlands. Journal of the Speleological Society of Korea 74:67-71 (in Korean).
27
Omar, M.Y., A. Maroyi and J.J. Van Tol. 2016. Floral diversity, composition and distribution in a montane wetland in Hogsback, the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Pak. J. Bot. 48(5):1861-1870.
28
Ramsar. 2022. Ramsar site and Convention Act. (accessed on 7 February 2022). https://www.ramsar.org/documents.
29
Son, H.J., Y.S. Kim, J.U. Yun, K.W. Chun and W.G. Park. 2014. The flora and vegetation structure of forest wetlands in Mt. Cheongok (Gyeongbuk Bonghwa). J. Korean Soc. For. Sci. 103(3):313-320 (in Korean). 10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.3.313
30
Tarnocai, C. 2006. The effect of climate change on carbon in Canadian peatlands. Glob. Planet. Change 53(4):222-232. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.03.012
31
Tiner, R.W. 1993. Using plants as indicators of wetland. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 144:240-253.
32
Zedler, J. B. and S. Kercher. 2005. Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30(1):39-74. 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248
Information
  • Publisher :The Plant Resources Society of Korea
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국자원식물학회
  • Journal Title :Korean Journal of Plant Resources
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국자원식물학회지
  • Volume : 35
  • No :4
  • Pages :471-501
  • Received Date : 2022-03-15
  • Revised Date : 2022-04-27
  • Accepted Date : 2022-05-09
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2022.35.4.471
Journal Informaiton Korean Journal of Plant Resources Korean Journal of Plant Resources
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close