Research Article

Korean Journal of Plant Resources. 31 December 2018. 622-633
https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2018.31.6.622

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Plant material and treatment

  •   Measurement of plant growth parameters

  •   Measurement of carotenoid content

  •   Measurement of free amino acid and proline

  •   Statistical analysis

  • Results and Discussion

  •   Plant growth parameter

  •   Free amino acid

  •   Carotenoid content

  •   Proline content

Introduction

Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. Pekinensis) is a leafy vegetable plant belonging to the family Brassicaceae. It is an important vegetable plant that is consumed throughout the year in South Korea (Soengas et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2013). The cultivation of Brassica crops has been increased in Korea (Kim et al., 2018). Annually, approximately 2 million tons of Chinese cabbage is produced in Korea, accounting for 25% of total vegetable consumed in the country (Kim et al., 2014). Chinese cabbage is rich in calcium, vitamin C, α- and β-carotenoids, free amino acids, proline, and glucosinolates that possesses anti-carcinogenic and antioxidant properties (Wang et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2015).

In South Korea, Chinese cabbage is cultivated in open field crop that are facing frequent water stress during their growing period because of climate change and abnormal weather (Lee et al., 2017). Especially, young stage of Chinese cabbage seedlings may be severely damage depending on intensity and the duration of drought stress (Bray, 1997). Preliminary experiment showed that after drought stress induction, plant growth parameters were significantly lower in the drought treated plants than control plants. Drought treated Chinese cabbage increased glucosinolates (GLSs) contents at two weeks of drought stress (Shawon et al., 2017).

Further, drought stress has a negative effect on carotenoid synthesis in plants (Haisel et al., 2006; Zeid and Sheedeed, 2006). Carotenoid is a functional component of Chinese cabbage, and it acts as an antioxidant and defends plant cells from light by the participating in light absorption (Demmig-Adams and Adams, 1996). Amino acids are identified as precursors and biosynthesis components of GLSs, proteins, and other nitrogen-based compounds (Gomes and Rosa, 2000; Rai, 2002). Free amino acids also play important roles in the adaptation of plants to diverse habitat (Gomes and Rosa, 2000). Furthermore, it has been reported that free amino acid accumulation in plants increases under drought stress condition (Rai, 2002). Proline helps plants to overcome stress conditions, such as drought (Szabados and Savoure, 2009). Accumulation of proline in plant is influenced by drought stress (Choudhary et al., 2005).

However, to the best of our knowledge the effects of drought stress on plant growth parameters, carotenoids, free amino acid and proline accumulation in autumn growing cultivar of Chinese cabbage have not been widely studied in Korea, as well as in other parts of the world. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate morphological traits and changes in carotenoids, free amino acids, and proline content of autumn growing Chinese cabbage under drought stress condition.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and treatment

The experiment was undertaken in a greenhouse at the Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea (latitude, 35°56'N; longitude, 126°57'E) during September-November, 2017. The seeds of Chinese cabbage (cv. Bulam Plus, Farm Hannong Co, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) were sown in a plug tray containing commercial growing media (Alpha-Plus; Sang-Lim Company, Iksan, South Korea). One-month-old seedlings were transplanted into plastic pots (28 ㎝ diameter × 22 ㎝ high) and maintained for up to three weeks (Fig. 1). The soil water content of drought treated and control plants were measured and maintained at 10% and 30% respectively (Fig. 2) by time-domain reflectometry (Field Scout TDR 100, Spectrum Technologies Inc, Aurora, USA). The seedlings received natural radiation and were watered daily using water can.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2018-031-06/N0820310605/images/kjpr_31_06_05_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Growing stage of Chinese cabbage both growing control (A) and growing drought-treated (B). The soil water content in control plant and drought-treated plant was maintained at 10% and 30%, respectively.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2018-031-06/N0820310605/images/kjpr_31_06_05_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Effect of drought stress on soil water content for three weeks. The soil water content in drought-stressed plants was measured and maintained at 10% by Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR). The control plants were maintained at 30% soil water content during the experiment period.

Measurement of plant growth parameters

At each harvest, Chinese cabbage plants were harvested at one, two, and three weeks after drought stress treatment. The number of leaves was counted manually, except those that were < 1 ㎝ in length. The plants were uprooted from pots, and the roots were carefully separated and washed with tap water. The leaf area per plant was measured using a leaf area meter (Li-3100, Li-Cor Inc., Neb., USA). The fresh weight of total leaves was measured using an electronic balance.

Measurement of carotenoid content

reeze-dried leaves of Chinese cabbage were pulverized and the lyophilized powder was used in further analysis. The content of carotenoids was determined by the methods of Tuan et al. (2012) with slight modifications. Briefly, 500 ㎎ of lyophilized powder of Chinese cabbage was mixed vigorously with 5 ㎖ of ethanol for 5 min and added to boiling water bath (75℃). Subsequently, 1.5 ㎖ of 80% potassium hydroxide was added. After 10 min of incubation under with ice cold condition, 2.5 ㎖ of ultra-pure water was added to the solution. Further, the crude sample was separated after mixing with equal volume of hexane. The organic solvent layer was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 3 min at 4℃. The collected upper layer of the extract was evaporated at room temperature and 2 ㎖ of dichloromethane/methanol (50:50, v/v) was added to dissolve the collected organic layer. For HPLC analysis, the filtered liquid was analyzed using a Perkin Elmer Flexar equipped with a C30 YMC column (250 ㎜ length × 4.6 ㎜ diameter, 3.0 ㎛ particle size; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA). The HPLC analysis was carried out with a flow rate of 1.0 ㎖/min and the detection wavelength was measured at 454 ㎚. The column oven temperature was maintained at 40℃. The solvent system employed was (A) 25:75 (v/v) water/methanol and (B) 100% ethyl acetate. The gradient program used was as follows: 0 min, 0% B; 0-4 min, 70% B; 4-20 min, 75% B; 20-28 min, 100% B; suddenly dropped to solvent 60% B at 28.1 min, and then maintained constant with solvent 60% B for 7 min (total 35 min). Individual carotenoids were quantified as ㎎ ㎏-1 dry weight (DW) by comparing the peak area of standard lutein, zeaxanthin, α-carotene, and β-carotene, respectively.

Measurement of free amino acid and proline

The 100 ㎎ of lyophilized powder in a 2 ㎖ test tube, 1.2 ㎖ of 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was added. The solution was vigorously vortexed for 5 min, incubated at room temperature for 60 min, and then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min at 4℃. The supernatant was diluted 100 times with 0.1 M HCl and the filtered through a 0.45 ㎛ PTFE syringe filter (Advantec DISMIC-13HP; Toyo Roshi Kaisha Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The filtrate was then analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The HPLC analysis of free amino acids was carried out by ‘a rapid, accurate, sensitive, and reproducible HPLC analysis of amino acids’ using Zorbax Eclipse-AAA Columns and the Agilent 1100 HPLC. Briefly, the separation of free amino acids was performed on a Zorbax Eclipse-AAA analytical (150 ㎜ length × 4.6 ㎜ internal diameter (i.d.), 5 ㎛ particle size) column with guard column Zorbax Eclipse-AAA 4-Pack (12.5 ㎜ length × 4.6 ㎜ (i.d.), 5 ㎛ particle size; Agilent Technologies). The detection wavelength was measured at 338 ㎚, and the column oven temperature was maintained at 40℃. The injection volume was 10 ㎖. The solvent system was delivered at a rate of 2.0 ㎖/min and consisted of a mixture of 40 mM NaH2PO4·H2O (pH 7.8, solvent A) and CAN:MeOH:water (45:45:10, v/v/v) (solvent B). The gradient program used was as follows: 0 min, 0% B; 0-1.9 min, 0% B; 1.9-21.1 min, 57% B; 21.1-21.6 min, 100% B; 21.6-25 min, 100% B; 25-25.1 min, 0% B; 25.1-30 min, 0% B. Further, 50 pmol/µL amino acid was used the standard. The quantification of different amino acids was based on peak area and calculated as equivalents of standard compounds. The content of amino acid is expressed as ㎎/100 g dry weight (DW).

Statistical analysis

The experimental design was conducted in a completely randomized design with 5 replications. The values are means ± SD of five measurements. SAS software version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA) was used for data analysis and identify significant effect of treatments. The ANOVA procedure was applied to determine significant difference followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at (P ≤ 0.05) between treatments.

Results and Discussion

Plant growth parameter

Up to 2 weeks after drought treatment, control plants and plants that had been treated with drought stress were not significantly different for leaf number, leaf area and fresh weight of Chinese cabbage. At week 3 after drought treatment, drought stress treated plants were significantly reduced leaf number, leaf area, and fresh weight of Chinese cabbage subjected to drought stress when compared with those of the control plants (Table 1). Compared with those of the control plants, at three week after drought stress, the leaf area and fresh weight of plants subjected to drought stress decreased by 21.7% and 25.0%, respectively. A similar reduction in leaf area (25%) and fresh weight (34%) has been reported in springtime-growing Chinese cabbage (cv. Chunkwang) subjected to drought stress (Shawon et al., 2017). Other studies have also showed that a significant reduction in leaf number, leaf area, and fresh weight in several Brassica species including Brassica rapa (Issarakraisila et al., 2007), Brassica oleracea (Wu et al., 2012), Brassica napus (Qaderi et al., 2006; Naderikharaji et al., 2008; Sangtarash et al., 2009), subjected to water stress. Water deficiency reduces plant growth by reducing turgor pressure, cell expansion, cell wall synthesis, and cell division (Hsiao, 1973; Jaleel et al., 2009, Anjum et al., 2011). Under water stress condition, plants try to adapt by reducing their leaf area for limited transpiration (Mahajan and Tuteja, 2005; Manivannan et al., 2007; Anjum et al., 2011). These results suggest that drought intensity, drought period, growing temperature and seedling age significantly influence plant growth parameters of Chinese cabbage under drought stress condition.

Table 1. Effect of drought stress on leaf number, leaf area and fresh weight of Chinese cabbage

Treatment Leaf number (no.) Leaf area (㎠) Fresh weight (g)
1 week after treatment
Control 10.4 ± z0.5ay 475.7 ± 79.6a 23.3 ± 4.4a
Drought 10.0 ± 0.7a 408.2 ± 109.1a 19.4 ± 5.2a
2 weeks after treatment
Control 13.8 ± 0.8a 948.8 ± 67.3a 52.4 ± 4.7a
Drought 12.6 ± 1.1a 849.7 ± 137.6a 45.6 ± 8.1a
3 weeks after treatment
Control 15.8 ± 0.6a 1307.3 ± 142.6a 76.7 ± 10.6a
Drought 14.4 ± 0.6b 1024.1 ± 111.6b 57.6 ± 7.0b
z± indicates the standard deviation of the mean (n = 5).
yMeans within columns at each week sharing the same letter are not significantly different by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at P≤0.05 (n = 5).

Free amino acid

In the present study, the content of aspartate, glutamate, serine, glutamine, threonine, arginine, norvaline, and tryptophan together accounted for approximately 80% of the total free amino acid pool in both the control and drought-stressed plants (Table 2, Fig. 3). At week 2 of treatment, there was a reduction in free amino acid content in plants subjected to drought stress which might be responsible for the reduced level of free amino acids (including aspartate, glutamate, GABA, valine, and norvaline) (Table 2). However, two weeks of drought-stress increased serine and glutamine content in Chinese cabbage when compared with those in the control. Furthermore, after two weeks of drought treatment, vitamin-U and lysine were not detected in drought-stressed plants, whereas, these were detected in untreated plants. For up to two weeks of treatment, the content of total free amino acids was significantly reduced in the drought-stressed Chinese cabbage than in the untreated control (Table 2). Under stress condition, a change in free amino acid content in plants is one of the earliest symptoms (Rai, 2002). Generally, it has been reported that amino acid accumulation increases in plants such as sunflower and sorghum, under drought stress because of osmotic adjustment to alleviate detrimental effects (Morgan, 1984; Yadav et al., 2005; Manivannan et al., 2007). The accumulation of amino acids during drought stress might be due to protein hydrolysis (Farooq et al., 2009). In contrast, drought stress decreased total free amino acid content in some plant species. For instance, El-bassiouny and Bekheta (2005) reported that water deficiency reduced total free amino acid content in wheat (Triticum aestivum). They showed that water deficiency decreased aspartate, valine, and lysine contents in wheat, whereas, there was an increase in glutamine and serine content. Glutamine accumulation has also been reported to increase in the leaves of rice (Oryza sativa) subjected to water deficiency (Yang et al., 2000). The content of aspartate and glutamate decreased in 28-d-old Lotus corniculatus, but the content of serine and glutamine increased under drought stress (Diaz et al., 2005). Glutamate act as a nitrogen source in the synthesis of glutamine from ammonia, and its synthesis is influenced by water stress condition in plants (Liaw and Eisenberg, 1994). During water stress, the activation of saccharopine pathway is one of the reasons for the decrease in aspartate content, leading to the accumulation of glutamine (Michaletti et al., 2017). The increase in serine content in plants might be due to high rate of photorespiration under water stress condition (Diaz et al., 2005). Additionally, age, cultivar, and drought intensity might be other reasons for the decreasing trend in total amino acid accumulation in Chinese cabbage under drought stress. Hausler et al. (2014) reported that amino acid catabolism depends on plant species and their developmental stages.

Table 2. Effect of drought stress on individual free-amino acid content in Chinese cabbage

Amino Acid Free amino acid (㎎/100 g DW)
Weeks after treatment
1 2 3
Control Drought Control Drought Control Drought
Aspartate 82.13 ± z2.29 79.48 ± 2.13 100.63 ± 3.63 93.25 ± 3.40 63.43 ± 7.12 64.05 ± 5.85
Glutamate 79.34 ± 5.70 78.66 ± 4.29 96.27 ± 3.31 76.88 ± 2.89 77.16 ± 11.61 96.80 ± 16.21
Asparagine 32.91 ± 2.15 30.21 ± 6.64 32.49 ± 3.24 36.63 ± 11.64 20.67 ± 10.12 15.03 ± 12.14
Serine 72.66 ± 17.16 89.72 ± 27.86 67.94 ± 15.59 101.32 ± 5.15 57.64 ± 14.59 63.46 ± 25.17
Vitamin U 27.33 ± 7.85 20.18 ± 2.56 19.78 ± 4.53 ND ND ND
Glutamine 54.47 ± 5.01 54.57 ± 6.22 61.05 ± 7.12 78.88 ± 8.73 36.27 ± 19.93 44.75 ± 21.37
Histidine 12.78 ± 1.96 13.96 ± 0.87 9.04 ± 1.86 8.93 ± 1.82 6.39 ± 3.07 2.79 ± 0.92
Glycine 25.46 ± 2.31 16.46 20.61 ± 2.63 18.94 ± 2.00 18.27 ± 3.40 12.05 ± 3.39
Threonine 64.62 ± 5.76 55.44 ± 3.83 71.58 ± 5.45 56.70 ± 19.76 32.31 ± 24.87 28.92 ± 10.84
Arginine 49.94 ± 6.27 52.80 ± 4.51 42.43 ± 2.04 47.79 ± 8.56 35.28 ± 20.45 28.89 ± 15.01
Alanine 9.01 ± 1.14 10.21 ± 0.45 10.40 ± 0.61 12.32 ± 2.63 10.88 ± 3.28 10.77 ± 6.02
GABA 9.26 ± 1.35 8.11 ± 0.62 7.31 ± 0.62 6.39 ± 0.25 7.09 ± 0.82 5.33 ± 1.19
Tyrosine 5.82 ± 0.55 6.01 ± 0.97 5.50 ± 0.44 5.07 ± 0.19 4.98 ± 0.23 4.18 ± 0.48
Cystine 28.88 ± 1.22 27.70 ± 0.73 19.95 ± 1.90 18.93 ± 2.76 20.26 ± 1.56 ND
Valine 24.72 ± 2.45 19.91 ± 1.68 14.96 ± 0.76 11.00 ± 2.40 24.55 ± 14.28 ND
Methionine 24.54 ± 2.45 21.68 ± 0.72 24.25 ± 2.82 19.73 ± 4.51 26.29 ± 0.00 ND
Norvaline 390.27 ± 34.69 313.48 ± 10.81 272.37 ± 17.86 236.36 ± 8.94 357.34 ± 88.34 248.40 ± 125.58
Tryptophan 40.59 ± 5.02 31.66 ± 0.89 30.23 ± 3.00 26.78 ± 0.72 38.36 ± 1.85 32.54 ± 14.65
Phenylalanine 9.86 ± 1.49 8.15 ± 0.93 8.04 ± 0.77 9.53 ± 2.35 13.77 ± 5.07 10.08 ± 7.47
Isoleucine 2.18 ± 0.44 2.67 ± 0.49 2.70 ± 0.23 2.56 ± 0.40 ND ND
Leucine 3.05 ± 0.20 3.75 ± 0.82 NDy ND ND ND
Lysine 2.64 ± 0.50 1.95 ± 0.52 1.69 ± 0.40 ND ND ND
Total 1052.45 ± 46.51 946.76 ± 32.47 919.21 ± 18.37 867.98 ± 19.81 850.94 ± 88.16 668.02 ± 94.02
z± indicates the standard deviation of the mean (n = 5).
yND = not detected.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2018-031-06/N0820310605/images/kjpr_31_06_05_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of total free amino acid in Chinese cabbage at 1 week after drought stress. The soil water content in control plant and drought-treated plant was maintained at 10% and 30%, respectively. 1, Aspartate; 2, Glutamate; 3, Asparagine; 4, Serine; 5, Vitamin U; 6, Glutamine; 7, Histidine; 8, Glycine; 9, Threonine; 10, Arginine; 11, Alanine; 12, GABA; 13, Tyrosine; 14, Cystine; 15, Valine; 16, Methionine; 17, Norvaline; 18, Tryptophan; 19, Phenylalanine; 20, Isoleucine; 21, Leucine; 22, Lysine.

Carotenoid content

For up to two weeks of treatment, lutein, zeaxanthin, α-carotene, β-carotene, and total carotenoid were identified, and their content was not significantly different between the control and drought-stressed plants (Table 3, Fig. 4). At three weeks of treatment, the content of α-carotene and β-carotene in drought-stressed plants were significantly higher than that in the untreated plants (Table 3). In general, the carotenoid content was not affected or marginally reduced in drought-stressed plants. Zushi and Matsuzoe (1998) reported that water deficiency had no effect on the content of xanthophyll and β-carotene in tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum). In canola (Brassica napus), the carotenoid content was not significantly different between the control and drought-stressed plants under ambient UVB (Sangtarash et al., 2009).

Table 3. Effect of drought stress on total carotenoid content in Chinese cabbage

Treatment Carotenoid (㎎/Kg DW)
Lutein Zeaxanthin α-Carotene β-Carotene Total
1 week after treatment
Control 682.68 ± z14.80ay 9.65 ± 0.80a 55.13 ± 2.29a 513.84 ± 17.73a 1261.29 ± 24.77a
Drought 713.32 ± 32.01a 7.64 ± 1.32a 60.64 ± 8.62a 563.01 ± 28.93a 1344.62 ± 57.12a
2 weeks after treatment
Control 441.19 ± 0.88a 8.73 ± 0.63a 21.98 ± 0.84a 292.21 ± 6.51a 764.11 ± 5.76a
Drought 441.21 ± 45.94a 9.05 ± 4.38a 24.12 ± 1.89a 314.30 ± 21.25a 788.67 ± 51.70a
3 weeks after treatment
Control 414.85 ± 9.43a 8.75 ± 0.49a 22.24 ± 1.38b 292.31 ± 4.13b 738.15 ± 7.18b
Drought 437.95 ± 15.01a 7.32 ± 0.15b 27.69 ± 0.18a 306.47 ± 6.95a 779.43 ± 17.09a
z± indicates the standard deviation of the mean (n = 5).
yMeans within columns at each week sharing the same letter are not significantly different by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at P≤0.05 (n = 5).

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2018-031-06/N0820310605/images/kjpr_31_06_05_F4.jpg
Fig. 4.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of carotenoid in Chinese cabbage at 2 weeks after drought stress. The soil water content in control plant and drought-treated plant was maintained at 10% and 30%, respectively. 1, Lutein; 2, Zeaxanthin; 3, α-Carotene; 4, β-Carotene.

A significant decrease in carotenoid content has been reported in several crops, subjected drought stress (Haisel et al., 2006). Drought stress might be negatively associated with photosynthesis process, which could be hindrance in the formation of photosynthetic pigments, including carotenoid (Zeid and Sheedeed, 2006). Sairam and Saxena (2000) reported that the antioxidant and pigment responses of plants are correlated during water stress. Preliminary studies have also showed that the antioxidants APX and SOD are unaffected in springtime-growing cultivar of Chinese cabbage subjected to three weeks drought stress (Shawon et al., 2017).

Carotenoid biosynthesis depends on the growing stage of plants (Cazzonelli and Pogson, 2010). Carotenoid content showed a decreasing trend with age in both drought-tolerant and susceptible cultivars of wheat (Sairam and Saxena, 2000). Carotenoid content in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves also decreased with age (Prochazkova et al., 2009). The decrease in carotenoid content in older leaf correlated with leaf senescence, declining the content of photosynthetic pigments because of the violaxanthin cycle (Prochazkova et al., 2009).

In contrast, at three weeks after drought treatment, the total carotenoid content significantly increased in drought-stressed Chinese cabbage than in the untreated control (Table 3). Increased level of individual carotenoids, including α-carotene and β-carotene might have increased the total carotenoid content in three week drought-stressed plants. It is assumed that the intensity of drought and production of β-carotene are positively correlated. Simkin et al. (2008) and Yun et al. (2018) reported that drought intensity leads to the formation of ROS in plants. It is necessary for organisms to suppress the production of ROS (Jang and Park, 2018). However, β-carotenoid helps reduce the production of singlet oxygen in photosynthetic tissue by quenching triplet chlorophyll (Farooq et al., 2009).

Proline content

In the present study, the content of proline did not significantly differ between drought-treated and control Chinese cabbage (Figs. 5 and 6). Similar results have also been reported by other studies. Pirzad et al. (2011) showed that proline content in Matricaria chamomilla L. was not affected by water deficiency, when field capacity maintained at 55%-100%. Chutia et al. (2012) reported that drought stress (osmotic potential of 0.15 bar by PEG 6000) did not significantly affect the proline content of four different rice cultivars.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2018-031-06/N0820310605/images/kjpr_31_06_05_F5.jpg
Fig. 5.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of proline in Chinese cabbage at 2 weeks after drought stress. The soil water content in control plant and drought-treated plant was maintained at 10% and 30%, respectively.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2018-031-06/N0820310605/images/kjpr_31_06_05_F6.jpg
Fig. 6.

Effect of drought stress on proline content in Chinese cabbage. Line above the bar represents the standard deviation of the mean (n=5).

Proline is an organic osmolyte that helps in osmotic adjustment in plants under stress, such as high salinity, high temperature, and drought stress (Ueda et al., 2001; Ashraf and Foolad, 2007; Jaleel et al., 2009). A significant increase in proline accumulation in plants is a common phenomenon under drought stress condition (Choudhary et al., 2005). Hayat et al. (2008) reported that during drought stress, proline accumulation significantly increased in 20-d and 30-d old tomato seedlings. Turkan et al. (2005) showed that in 35-d-old bean cultivar seedlings (P. vulgaris, and P. acutifolius) subjected to drought stress (PEG 6000) for two weeks, there was an increase in proline accumulation. Furthermore, drought stress-induced, increase in proline synthesis was observed in chick pea (Mafakheri et al., 2010) and wheat (Vendruscolo et al., 2007). Reduced glutamate content might be responsible for the non-significant proline accumulation in Chinese cabbage observed in the present study, as glutamate is the major source of proline synthesis in plants under osmotic stress (Choudhary et al., 2005).

In conclusion, the result of the present study showed that drought stress in Chinese cabbage significantly reduced plant growth parameters and affected the content of total and individual free amino acids and carotenoid. However, during three weeks of drought stress, there was no significant change in the content of proline in Chinese cabbage.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant (PJ012613042018) from the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

1
Anjum, S.A., X. Xie, L. Wang, M.F. Saleem, C. Man and W. Lei. 2011. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afri. J. Agric. Res. 6:2026-2032.
2
Ashraf, M. and M.R. Foolad. 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59:206-216.
10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
3
Bray, E.A. 1997. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci. 2:48-54.
10.1016/S1360-1385(97)82562-9
4
Cazzonelli, C.I. and B.J. Pogson. 2010. Source to sink: regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 15:266-274.
10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.00320303820
5
Choudhary, N.L., R.K. Sairam and A. Tyagi. 2005. Expression of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gene during drought in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J. Biochem. Biophy. 42:366-370.
6
Chutia, J., S.P. Borah and B. Tanti. 2012. Effect of drought stress on protein and proline metabolism in seven traditional rice (Oryza sativa Linn.) genotypes of Assam, India. J. Res. Biol. 2:206-214.
7
Demmig-Adams, B. and W.W. Adams III. 1996. The role of xanthophyll cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 1:21-26.
10.1016/S1360-1385(96)80019-7
8
Diaz, C., S. Purdy, A. Christ, J.F. Morot-Gaudry, A. Wingler and C. Masclaux-Daubresse. 2005. Characterization of markers to determine the extent and variability of leaf senescence in arabidopsis. A metabolic profiling approach. Plant Physiol. 138:898-908.
10.1104/pp.105.06076415923326PMC1150406
9
El-bassiouny, H.M.S. and M.A. Bekheta. 2005. Effect of salt stress on relative water content, lipid peroxidation, polyamines, amino acids and ethylene of two wheat cultivars. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 7:363-368.
10
Farooq, M., A. Wahid, N. Kobayashi, D. Fujita and S.M.A. Basra. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29:185-212.
10.1051/agro:2008021
11
Gomes, M.H. and E. Rosa. 2000. Free amino acid composition in primary and secondary inflorescences of 11 broccoli (Brassica oleracea var italica) cultivars and its variation between growing seasons. J. Sci. Food Agric. 81:295-299.
10.1002/1097-0010(200102)81:3<295::AID-JSFA811>3.0.CO;2-#
12
Haisel, D., J. Pospisilova, H. Synkova, R. Schnablova and P. Batkova. 2006. Effects of abscisic acid or benzyladenine on pigment contents, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chloroplast ultrastructure during water stress and after rehydration. Photosynthetica 44:606-614.
10.1007/s11099-006-0079-5
13
Hausler, R.E., F. Ludewig and S. Krueger. 2014. Amino acids-a life between metabolism and signaling. Plant Sci. 229:225-237.
10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.09.01125443849
14
Hayat, S., S.A. Hasan, Q. Fariduddin and A. Ahmed. 2008. Growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in response to salicylic acid under water stress. J. Plant Sci. 3:297-304.
10.1080/17429140802320797
15
Hsiao, T.C. 1973. Plant responses to water stress. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24:519-570.
10.1146/annurev.pp.24.060173.002511
16
Issarakraisila, M., Q. Ma and D.W. Turner. 2007. Photosynthetic and growth responses of juvenile chinese kale (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra) and caisin (Brassica rapa subsp. parachinensis) to waterlogging and water deficit. Sci. Hort. 111:107-113.
10.1016/j.scienta.2006.10.017
17
Jaleel, C.A., P. Manivannan, A. Wahid, M. Farooq, H.J. Al-Juburi, R. Somasundaram and R. Panneerserlvam. 2009. Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 11:100-105.
18
Jang, T.W. and J.H. Park. 2018. Antioxidant activity and inhibitory effects on oxidative DNA damage of callus from Abeliophyllum distichum nakai. Korean J. Plant Res. 31:228-236.
19
Kim, J.H., Y.A. Jung, B.Y. Song, Y.S. Bong, D.H. Ryu, K.S. Lee and G.S. Hwang. 2013. Discrimination of cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) cultivars grown in different geographical areas using 1H NMR-based metabolomics. Food Chem. 137:68-75.
10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.10.01223199992
20
Kim, K.S., W. Park, Y.H. Lee, J.E. Lee, Y.H. Moon, Y.L. Cha and Y.S. Song. 2018. Development of flower color changed landscape plant through interspecific and intergeneric crosses of several Cruciferae crops. Korean J. Plant Res. 31:77-85.
21
Kim, S.S., G.U. Seong, H.Y. Hwang, M.C. Jeong and S.K. Chung. 2014. The short-term storage characteristics of cut Kimchi cabbages treated with Ca2+. Korean J. Food Preserv. 21:157-162.
10.11002/kjfp.2014.21.2.157
22
Lee, D.S., D.S. Jeon, S.G. Park, M.V. Arasu, N.A. Al-Dhabi, S.C. Kim and S.J. Kim. 2015. Effect of cold storage on the contents of glucosinolates in chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). South Indian J. Biol. Sci. 1:38-42.
10.22205/sijbs/2015/v1/i1/100441
23
Lee, J.H., H.J. Lee, S.K. Kim, S.G. Lee, H.S. Lee and C.S. Choi. 2017. Development of growth models as affected by cultivation season and transplanting date and estimation of prediction yield in kimchi cabbage. Protec. Hort. Plant Fac. 26:235-241.
10.12791/KSBEC.2017.26.4.235
24
Liaw, S.H. and D. Eisenberg. 1994. Structural model for the reaction mechanism of glutamine synthetase, based on five crystal structures of enzyme-substrate complexes. Biochem. 33:675-681.
10.1021/bi00169a007
25
Mafakheri, A., A. Siosemardeh, B. Bahramnejad, P.C. Struik and E. Sohrabi. 2010. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian J. Crop Sci. 4:580-585.
26
Mahajan, S. and N. Tuteja. 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arc. Biochem. Biophy. 444:139-158.
10.1016/j.abb.2005.10.01816309626
27
Manivannan, P., C.A. Jaleel, B. Sankar, A. Kishorekumar, R. Somasundaram, G.M.A. Laksmanan and R. Panneerselvam. 2007. Growth, biochemical modifications and proline metabolism in Helianthus annuus L. as induced by drought stress. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 59:141-149.
10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.05.00217560769
28
Michaletti, A., M. Gioia, U. Tarantino and L. Zolla. 2017. Effects of microgravity on osteoblast mitochondria: a proteomic and metabolomics profile. Sci. Rep. 7:1-13.
10.1038/s41598-017-15612-129133864PMC5684136
29
Morgan, J.M. 1984. Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35:299-319.
10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.001503
30
Naderikharaji, R., H. Pakniyat and A.R. Biabani. 2008. Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic rate of four rapeseed (Brassica napus) cultivars. J. App. Sci. 8:4460-4463.
10.3923/jas.2008.4460.4463
31
Pirzad, A., M.R. Shakiba, S. Zehtab-Salmasi, S.A. Mohammadi, R. Darvishzadeh and A. Samadi. 2011. Effect of water stress on leaf relative water content, chlorophyll, proline and soluble carbohydrates in Matricaria chamomilla L. J. Medi. Plants Res. 5:2483-2488.
32
Procházková, D., D. Haisel and N. Wilhelmová. 2009. Content of carotenoids during ageing and senescence of tobacco leaves with genetically modulated life-span. Photosynthetica 47:409-414.
10.1007/s11099-009-0062-z
33
Qaderi, M.M., L.V. Kurepin and D.M. Reid. 2006. Growth and physiological responses of canola (Brassica napus) to three components of global climate change: temperature, carbon dioxide and drought. Physiol. Plant. 128:710-721.
10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00804.x
34
Rai, V.K. 2002. Role of amino acids in plant responses to stresses. Biol. Planta. 45:481-487.
10.1023/A:1022308229759
35
Sairam, R.K. and D.C. Saxena. 2000. Oxidative stress and antioxidants in wheat genotypes: possible mechanism of water stress tolerance. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 184:55-61.
10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00358.x
36
Sangtarash, M.H., M.M. Qaderi, C.C. Chinnappa and D.M. Ried. 2009. Differential sensitivity of canola (Brassica napus) seedlings to ultraviolet-B radiation, water stress and abscisic acid. Env. Exp. Bot. 66:212-219.
10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.03.004
37
Shawon, R., S.G. Lee, S.K. Kim, H.J. Lee, J.H. Bae and Y.G. Ku. 2017. Effect of drought stress on plant growth characteristics, bioactive compounds, and glucosinolate content of chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa). Hort. Sci. Technol. 35:42-43.
38
Simkin, A.J., H. Moreau, M. Kuntz, G. Pagny, C. Lin, S. Tanksley and J. McCarthy. 2008. An investigation of carotenoid biosynthesis in Coffea canephora and Coffea Arabica. J. Plant Physiol. 165:1087-1106.
10.1016/j.jplph.2007.06.01617942183
39
Soengas, P., T. Sotelo, P. Velasco and M.E. Cartea. 2011. Antioxidant properties of Brassica vegetables. Functional Plant Sci. Biotech. 5:43-55.
40
Szabados, L. and A. Savoure. 2009. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 15:89-97.
10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.00920036181
41
Tuan, P.A., J.K. Kim, J.Y. Lee, W.T. Park, D.Y. Kwon, Y.B. Kim, H.H. Kim, H.R. Kim and S.U. Park. 2012. Analysis of carotenoid accumulation and expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in different organs of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis). Excli J. 11:508-516.
27540344PMC4983711
42
Turkan, I., M. Bor, F. Ozdemir and H. Koca. 2005. Differential responses of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in the leaves of drought-tolerant P. acutifolius gray and drought-sensitive P. vulgaris L. subjected to polyethylene glycol mediated water stress. Plant Sci. 168:223-231.
10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.032
43
Ueda, A., W. Shi, K. Sanmiya, M. Shono and T. Takabe. 2001. Functional analysis of salt-inducible proline transporter of barley roots. Plant Cell Physiol. 42:1282-1289.
10.1093/pcp/pce16611726714
44
Vendruscolo, E.C.G., I. Schuster, M. Pileggi, C.A. Scapim, H.B.C. Molinari, C.J. Marur and L.G.E. Vieira. 2007. Stress-induced synthesis of proline confers tolerance to water deficit in transgenic wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 164:1367-1376.
10.1016/j.jplph.2007.05.00117604875
45
Wang, H., J. Wu, S. Sun, B. Liu, F. Cheng, R. Sun and X. Wang. 2011. Glucosinolate biosynthetic genes in Brassica rapa. Gene 487:135-142.
10.1016/j.gene.2011.07.02121835231
46
Wu, H., X. Wu, Z. Li, L. Duan and M. Zhang. 2012. Physiological evaluation of drought stress tolerance and recovery in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) seedlings treated with methyl jasmonate and coronatine. J. Plant Growth Regu. 31:113-123.
10.1007/s00344-011-9224-x
47
Yadav, S.K., N.J. Lakshmi, M. Maheswari, M. Vanaja and B. Venkateswarlu. 2005. Influence of water deficit at vegetative, anthesis and grain filling stages on water relation and grain yield in sorghum. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 10:20-24.
48
Yang, C.W., C.C. Lin and C.H. Kao. 2000. Proline, ornithine, arginine and glutamic acid contents in detached rice leaves. Biol. Planta. 43:305-307.
10.1023/A:1002733117506
49
Yun, M.H., H.R. Jeong, J.H. Yoo, S.K. Roy, S.J. Kwon, J.H. Kim, H.C. Chun, K.Y. Jung, S.W. Cho and S.H. Woo. 2018. Proteome characterization of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) at vegetative stage under waterlogging stress. Korean J. Plant Res. 31:124-135.
50
Zeid, I.M. and Z.A. Sheedeed. 2006. Response of alfalfa to putrescine treatment under drought stress. Biol. Planta. 50:635-640.
10.1007/s10535-006-0099-9
51
Zushi, K. and N. Matsuzoe. 1998. Effect of soil water deficit on vitamin C, sugar, organic acid, amino acid and carotene contents of large-fruited tomatoes. J. Japan Soc. Hort. Sci. 67:927-933.
10.2503/jjshs.67.927
페이지 상단으로 이동하기