Research Article

Korean Journal of Plant Resources. 1 December 2024. 607-616
https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2024.37.6.607

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Plant materials and cultivation

  •   Morphological traits

  •   Anthracnose inoculum preparation and inoculation

  •   Disease index

  •   Statistical analysis

  • Results and Discussion

  •   Morphological traits

  •   Distribution of disease index

  •   Correlation between morphological traits and disease index

  •   Principal component analysis (PCA)

Introduction

Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) is an important crop with a production of 100 million tons in 2022 worldwide, and 489,897 tons in Korea (FAO, 2023). In modern agriculture, plant diseases are one of the important factors which reduce fruit quality and yield. Colletotrichum orbiculare is a fungal pathogen that causes anthracnose in watermelon and other cucurbits such as cucumber, melon, squash and pumpkin (Wasilwa et al., 1993). C. orbiculare cause symptoms all the above-ground parts of plants, such as leaf, stem and fruits. C. orbiculare causes dark brown lesion on leaf and as the disease progresses, the center of the lesion is pierced. In fruits, symptoms start as a small black spot, lesions sink and show spores on the lesion (Anderson and Walker, 1962). This anthracnose can therefore reduce fruit quality and cause loss in fruit yield.

Pathological races of C. orbiculare were defined as race 1-3 based on watermelon, cucumber and squash (Goode, 1958). Race 4 (Dutta et al., 1960) and 5, 6, and 7 (Jenkins et al., 1964) were defined later. In watermelon, race 1, 2 and 3 were identified by pathogenicity on ‘Charleston Gray’, ‘Congo’, ‘Fairfax’, ‘Garrison’ and ‘New Hampshire Midget’ (Goode and Winstead, 1957). ‘Garrison’ and ‘New Hampshire Midget’ are susceptible to all races, ‘Charleston Gray’, ‘Congo’, and ‘Fairfax’ are resistant to race 1 and 3, but susceptible to race 2. Wasilwa et al. (1993) examined the pathogenicity of 92 C. orbiculare isolates from the U.S and segregated them into two races. Matsuo et al. (2022) reported races of anthracnose isolates distributed in Japan. But little is known about distribution of races with in Korea (Huh et al., 2010a).

Chemical control, field management, and crop rotation have been used to control anthracnose (Patel et al., 2023). Effectiveness of fungicides have been evaluated in the past (Byrd-Masters, 2018; Egel and Marchino, 2018; Keinath, 2018). Potential of endophytic fungi from watermelon leaf for biocontrol has been evaluated previously (Pradeep et al., 2022).

Screening for resistant and development of resistant cultivars have been conducted since 1937. Layton (1937) identified five resistant cultivars from Africa and carried out breeding of resistant commercial cultivars. The first resistant commercial cultivars being released in 1949 (Andrus, 1955). After the pathological races of C. orbiculare were defined, Winstead et al. (1959) examined the resistance of 86 watermelon cultivars to race 1 and 3, and reported 10 resistant cultivars as well as the resistance gene to anthracnose race 1 and 3, namely, Ar-1. The SNP marker CL 14-27-9 was designed as the diagnostic marker of race 1 resistance (Jang et al., 2019) and used for developing resistant cultivar. Commercial cultivars resistant to race 1 were developed by companies in Japan, Switzerland and the USA (Patel et al., 2023), however, many cultivars are found to be susceptible to race 2 (Keinath, 2017). Previously, watermelon cultivars resistant to anthracnose race 3 were developed in Korea (Huh et al., 2010a, 2010b).

In case of race 2, several resistant PI lines (PI 189225, 203551, 270550, 271775, 271778, 271779, 299379 and 326515) were reported in 1980s (Sowell et al., 1980; Suvanprakorn and Norton, 1980). Boyhan et al. (1994) evaluated 67 PI lines resistant to race 2 and verified previously reported resistant lines and added a new resistant source, PI 512385. Similarly, Patel (2019) evaluated resistance of 1,408 PI germplasms. Suvanprakorn and Norton (1980) reported that the major resistance to race 2 was controlled by a dominant single gene pair, but other genes contributing to resistance were also suggested (Love and Rhodes, 1988).

Morphological traits and disease resistance are important factors for breeding and studies on morphological diversity on genetic resources have been conducted in the past (Desta et al., 2024; Huh et al., 2014; Solmaz and sari, 2009; Szamosi et al., 2009). Study for association of morphological traits and disease resistance were conducted. Iqbal et al. (2024) evaluated brown rust resistance using morphological traits in bread wheat and Zengin et al. (2020) analyzed the relation between morpological traits such as leaf attitude and resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) in tomato. Egea-Gilabert et al. (2008) reported correlation of leaf width and necrosis length of Phytophthora capsici on pepper, leaf angle correlated on brown spot disease severity in rice (Dariush et al., 2020). Especially, relation of anthracnose resistance and morphological traits were studied in common bean (Kiptoo et al., 2020) and sorghum (Mengistu et al., 2020), but not previously reported in watermelon. In this study, we have evaluated anthracnose resistance and morphological traits of 85 watermelon germplasms, followed by investigations on the relationship between resistance to anthracnose and morphological traits.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and cultivation

Seventy nine sweet watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and 6 egusi melon (C. mucosospermus) germplasms from the gene bank of the National Agrobiodiversity Center (NAC), Rural Development Administration (RDA), Jeonju, South Korea were used. Six commercial cultivars were used as control. Plants were cultivated at the research field of the NAC, Jeonju, Republic of Korea. Plants were grown following the cultivation manual for watermelon by RDA (RDA, 2022). In brief, seeds were sowed on March 22, 2022, and grown in a nursery bed. Seedlings were grafted on bottle gourd by single cotyledon ordinary splice grafting methods. Ten seedlings were transplanted in a plastic greenhouse on May 03, 2022 with 40 ㎝ × 300 ㎝ spacing. Fruits of the watermelon were harvested 45 days (on average) after pollination at a fully mature stage. Multiplied seeds were used for evaluating resistance to anthracnose.

Morphological traits

The morphological characters were evaluated based on descriptions for watermelon (RDA, 2013) at the physiologically mature stage in the field. Eight quantitative traits (length of leaf, width of leaf, size of pistil scar, weight of fruit, length of fruit, width of fruit, thickness of pericarp and soluble solids contents) were evaluated with help of ruler, digital caliper, digital balance, and a handheld electronic refractometer. Details and measurements of quantitative traits are listed in Table 1. Ten plant samples per each accession were used for the measurement of quantitative morphological characters.

Table 1.

Definition of morphological traits.

Descriptor Definition
LL Length of fully developed leaves on the main vine, from the 10th to the 15th leaf (㎝)
LW Width of fully developed leaves on the main vine, from the 10th to the 15th leaf (㎝)
SPS Size of pistil scar (㎜)
WF Weight of fruit (g)
LF Length of fruit (㎝)
WIF Width of fruit (㎝)
TP Thickness of pericarp (㎜)
SSC Soluble solids content (Brix)

Anthracnose inoculum preparation and inoculation

Multiplied seeds from each accessions were sown and used for evaluating resistance to anthracnose. Colletotrichum orbiculare KACC 40809 from Korean Agricultural Culture Collection (KACC) was used to infect the seedlings. The inoculum preparation and inoculation procedure was carried out as described by Correa et al. (2021). In brief, the fungus was grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 12 days. Spores were harvested by adding 2 mL distilled water to each agar plate, rubbing the surface of the agar. Spore suspension was filtered through two layers of cheesecloth into a beaker. Concentration of the inoculum was measured using a hemocytometer and adjusted to 1×105 spores/mL. The spore inoculum was sprayed to 22-days-old watermelon seedlings grown in the growth chamber. After inoculation, seedlings were transferred to a humidity chamber for 48 h in darkness at 90–100% relative humidity (RH), and at a temperature of 25℃. Then, seedlings were moved to a plant growth chamber with 25℃, 60% RH, 12 h light/dark cycle until evaluating the disease index.

Disease index

Disease index (DI) of eight inoculated seedlings were rated at 12 days post inoculation (dpi). The disease index (Fig. 1) was evaluated at a range of 1 to 5 based on percentage of leaf area lesion, adopted from Gichimu et al. (2008). Seedlings with DI≤2 were considered resistant and DI≥4 were considered susceptible.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2024-037-06/N0820370608/images/kjpr_2024_376_607_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Disease index for watermelon anthracnose by C. orbiculare KACC 40809 on watermelon at 12 days after inoculation by spray method. Disease index was rated 1 to 5 on leaf lesion area ratio 1, 0-20%; 2, 21-40%; 3, 41-60%; 4, 60-80% and 5, 81-100%.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls tests (α = 0.05), conducted R-program (Version 4.3.3, RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA, USA), was employed to determine the significance of the variation between the mean concentration of each compound between the samples. Correlation analysis and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) also conducted using R-program (Version 4.3.3, RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA, USA).

Results and Discussion

Morphological traits

The variation in quantitative morphological traits in watermelon germplasms are summarized in Table 2. The length and width of leaves were at 28.9±2.3 ㎝ and 30.5±2.9 ㎝, respectively. Weight of fruits ranged at 5955±2248 g, length and width of fruits were 24.0±3.9 ㎝ and 22.3±3.0 ㎝ respectively. Size of pistil scar was at 18.0±9.7 ㎜, thickness of pericarp was 17.8±4.8 ㎜ and soluble solids contents were 8.0±1.6 Brix. Study of morphological traits indicated a wide range of variation, and the highest variation was observed on size of pistil scar (SPS), 53.9%. The lowest variation was observed in leaf length (LL), 8.1%. Assefa et al. (2020) report size of the pistil scar and thickness of the pericarp showed high diversity. Length and width of the leaves were at a range higher than previous studies (Solmaz and Sari, 2009; Szamosi et al., 2009). Size of pistil scar and weight of fruit also had higher values, including the length and width of fruits. Soluble solids contents were similar to the report previous published (Assefa et al., 2020; Solmaz and Sari, 2009; Szamosi et al., 2009). In this study, pericarp was observed to be thicker than previous research study (Assefa et al., 2020; Elbekkay et al., 2021; Huh et al., 2014; Solmaz and Sari, 2009; Szamosi et al., 2009). This difference could be due to the 6 egusi melon (C. mucosospermus) germplasms used in this study, which has thicker pericarp than the other Citrullus species (Achigan-Dako et al., 2015).

Table 2.

Summary statistics of morphological traits of watermelon germplasm.

Parametersz Minimum Maximum Mean SD CV (%)
LL (㎝) 23.4 36.1 28.9 2.3 8.1
LW (㎝) 24.5 38.5 30.5 2.9 9.4
SPS (㎜) 5.5 53.7 18.0 9.7 53.9
WF (g) 2449.0 13570.0 5955.0 2248.0 37.7
LF (㎝) 17.0 37.2 24.0 3.9 16.4
WIF (㎝) 14.7 31.0 22.3 3.0 13.3
TP (㎜) 9.0 38.8 17.8 4.8 26.8
SSC (Brix) 3.2 11.2 8.0 1.6 19.8

zLL, length of leaf; LW, width of leaf; SPS, size of pistil scar, WF, weight of fruit; LF, length of fruit; WIF, width of fruit; TP, thickness of pericarp; SSC, soluble solids contents; SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation.

Distribution of disease index

C. orbiculare KACC 40809 were inoculated in 85 accessions which included 4 differential hosts (Charleston Gray, Congo, Fairfax, New hampsher midget). Shim et al. (2013) has reported that pathological races belonging to isolate KACC 40809 estimated race 2, yielded similar results with the this study, which showed that all the differential host’s DI has exceed 2.

Six accessions showed resistance and 77 accessions were found to be susceptible (Fig. 2). Six accessions were distributed in DI≥2 and 77 accessions in DI≤4, only 2 accessions (4.7%) showed moderate resistance. The number of accessions with moderate resistance were low and accessions were divided primarily between resistant and susceptible in this study. These results may stem from resistance to race 1 and 3 (Winstead et al., 1959) and major resistance to race 2 were controlled by a dominant single gene pair (Suvanprakorn and Norton, 1980).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2024-037-06/N0820370608/images/kjpr_2024_376_607_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Distribution of mean disease index of watermelon accessions for watermelon anthracnose by C. orbiculare KACC 40809 on watermelon 12 days after inoculation by spray method. Disease index (DI) 1, leaf lesion area 0-20%; 2, 21-40%; 3, 41-60%; 4, 60-80% and 5, 81-100%.

Six accessions which exhibited DI less than 2 are shown in Fig. 3 which includes one accession of C. lanatus and five accessions of C. mucosospermus. Three accessions were found to originate from Nigeria (NGA), 2 from Zaire (ZAR) and 1 from Zambia (ZMB). Watermelon and their wild relatives originated from Africa, especially C. mucosospermus is native to West Africa including Nigeria (Renner et al., 2021). High genetic diversity of crops and wild relatives can be found in the vicinity of center of origin, and in this case, wild relatives of watermelon such as C. amarus (Winstead et al., 1959) and C. colocynthis (Love and Rhodes, 1988) were reported as germplasms of resistance.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2024-037-06/N0820370608/images/kjpr_2024_376_607_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

Watermelon seedlings (a-f) and their fruit (g-l) which disease index (DI) were below 2.0 at 12 days after inoculation with C. orbiculare KACC 40809, (a, g) K193166 (C. lanantus) from Zambia, DI 1.0 (b, h) K193327 (C. mucosospermus) from Zaire, DI 1.0 (c, i) K193155 (C. mucosospermus) from Nigeria, DI 1.2±0.4 (d, j) K193434 (C. mucosospermus) from Nigeria, DI 1.3±0.5 (e, k) K193436 (C. mucosospermus) from Nigeria, DI 1.6±0.5 (f, l) K193328 (C. mucosospermus) from Zaire, DI 1.8±0.5. Scale bar = 14 ㎝.

Correlation between morphological traits and disease index

Some of the studied characters had a significantly with each other. Table 3 shows correlation between high traits of watermelon germplasms. The length of leaf was significantly positively correlated with width of leaf (r=0.852). Weight of the fruit was also significantly correlated with length of fruit (r=0.718) and width of fruit (r=0.906), length and width of fruit were also significantly correlated (r=0.658) with each other. Soluble solids content (SSC) was correlated with leaf length (r=0.279) and DI (r=0.500). We observed that the DI values significantly correlated to length of leaf (r=0.388), width of leaf (r=0.308) and size of pistil scar (r=0.300). Traits dealing with the leaf size (length and width of leaf) were positively correlated with traits about fruit size (weight, length and width of fruit) which was also statistically significant with each other. Assefa et al. (2020) and Sahin (2024) also reported weight, length and width of fruits correlated with each other, and Achigan-Dako et al. (2015) reported that length and width of leaf were significantly correlated, as well as weight, length and width of fruit were significantly related in his research using four Citrullus species (C. lanatus, C. mucosospermus, C. amarus, and C. colocynthis). Disease severity showed correlation with length and width of leaf, size of pistil scar and soluble solids content in this study. Egea-Gilabert et al. (2008) reported necrosis length of Phytophthora capsici on pepper were correlated with leaf width, resistant plants showed small leaves. Kiptoo et al. (2020) reported anthracnose resistance correlation to leaf length and width in common bean.

Table 3.

Pearson’s correlation coefficient of traits for watermelon genetic resources.

LL LW SPS WF LF WIF TP SSC DI
LLz 1
LWy 0.852*** 1
SPSx 0.123 0.008 1
WFw 0.296** 0.312** 0.057 1
LFv 0.234* 0.314** -0.227* 0.718*** 1
WIFu 0.131 0.134 0.080 0.906*** 0.658*** 1
TPt -0.244* -0.194* 0.016 0.246* 0.125 0.226* 1
SSCs 0.279** 0.201* 0.266* -0.041 -0.156 -0.120 -0.133 1
DIr 0.388*** 0.308** 0.300** 0.241* -0.033 0.175 -0.111 0.500*** 1

zLL, length of leaf;

yLW, width of leaf;

xSPS, size of pistil scar,

wWF, weight of fruit;

vLF, length of fruit;

uWIF, width of fruit;

tTP, thickness of pericarp;

sSSC, soluble solids contents;

rDI, Disease index. Significance are demonstrated as

***, P≤ 0.001; **, P≤0.01 and *, P≤0.05.

Principal component analysis (PCA)

The first three principal components Eigenvalue exceed 1.0 and explained 33.2, 24.8, and 15.2% of the variations, respectively, making a total of 73.2% Fruit weight (25.5%), width (19.6%), length (17.5%) and leaf width (14.8%), length (14.5%) were important variables composing PC1. While PC2 included soluble solid contents (20.3%) and Disease index (13.3%). Size of pistil scar significantly contributed (32.6%) to PC3 (Table 4). Accessions were found to segregate into three groups on the PCA plot (Fig. 4). Cluster 1, 2 and 3 included 46, 9 and 30 accessions, respectively. Variations of traits in three clusters are explained in Fig. 5. In summary, cluster 2 had significantly low value in leaf length (26.2±2.1 ㎝), leaf width (28±2.1 ㎝), disease index (2.2±1.5), size of pistil scar (8.3±2.4 ㎜) and soluble solid content (4.8±1.7 brix). Fruit weight (8380.9±1669.8 g) and fruit width (25.1±2.1 ㎝) were significantly high in cluster 3, whereas cluster 1 and 2 were not significantly different. Fruit lengths were significantly highest in cluster 3 (27.3±3 ㎝), lowest in cluster 1 (21.8±2.3 ㎝). Thickness of pericarp were significantly low in cluster 1 (16.1±3.7 ㎜) than cluster 2 (19.7±3.3 ㎜) and cluster 3 (19.7±5.7 ㎜). Accessions segregated into three clusters, due to all morphological traits showing significant variation. Characteristically, cluster 1 accessions showed low pericarp thickness, cluster 3 accessions had biggest fruit. Accessions in cluster 2 had small leaf, small pistil scar, low SSC and DI. Previous studies reported accessions to exhibit variations in morphological traits (Sahin, 2024; Solmaz and sari, 2009; Szamosi et al., 2009), number of clusters and traits that distinguished the clusters were different. In this study, all of the 6 C. mucosopermus accessions were in cluster 2, which was similar with the previous study where C. mucosospermus accessions were grouped on principal component analysis using C. lanatus, C. colocynthis and C. mucosospermus accessions (Achigan-Dako et al., 2015).

Table 4.

Contribution of traits for principal components, eigenvalues, proportion and cumulative variation.

Descriptorz PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5
LL 14.53171 13.25804 8.464354 2.085066 8.685102
LW 14.80356 8.788242 14.33632 5.487421 8.005440
SPS 0.375919 6.177224 32.56144 11.85077 37.85418
WF 25.52964 6.142924 2.302304 0.846371 0.281844
LF 17.48506 9.85126 3.515809 0.188810 2.606418
WIF 19.63275 9.869231 4.870340 6.667137 0.680365
TP 0.121430 11.33471 14.79284 66.24092 5.913225
SSC 0.867541 20.35181 8.152930 6.622847 23.39686
DI 6.652401 14.22656 11.00366 0.010663 12.57657
Eigenvalue 2.99 2.24 1.37 0.74 0.73
Proportion 33.2 24.8 15.2 8.30 8.10
Cumulative 33.2 58.0 73.2 81.5 89.6

zLL, length of leaf; LW, width of leaf; SPS, size of pistil scar, WF, weight of fruit; LF, length of fruit; WIF, width of fruit; TP, thickness of pericarp; SSC, soluble solids contents; DI, Disease index.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2024-037-06/N0820370608/images/kjpr_2024_376_607_F4.jpg
Fig. 4.

Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-Biplot of watermelon germplasms with morphological characters measured quantitatively. SPS = Size of pistil scar (mm); WS = Width of stripes (mm); WF = Weight of fruit (kg); LF = Length of fruit (cm); WIF = Width of fruit (cm); TP = Thickness of outer layer of pericarp (mm); SSC = Soluble solids content (Brix). DI = Disease index.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2024-037-06/N0820370608/images/kjpr_2024_376_607_F5.jpg
Fig. 5.

Variations in agronomical traits of watermelon germplasm according to clusters on Principal Component Analysis. Different letters indicate significant differences between clusters based on ANOVA test (p < 0.05).

In conclusion, this study evaluated the resistanceto anthracnose and quantitative morphological traits of 85 watermelon accessions and their correlation with each other. Six accessions from Africa showed resistance, which included one accession of C. lanatus, and five from C. mucosospermus. Accessions which showed resistance to anthracnose characteristically had small leaf, pistil scar and low soluble solids content. Resistance accessions and their characteristics observed in this study will provide the preliminary data on selecting the resources in further research for anthracnose resistance and morphological traits in watermelon.

Acknowledgements

We would appreciate to Dr. Hemavathi Brijesh for assistance in editing this manuscript. This study was carried out with the support of the Research Program for Agricultural Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01421401), National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1

Achigan-Dako, E.G., E.S. Avohou, C. Linsoussi, A. Ahanchede, R.S. Vodouhe and F.R. Blattner. 2015. Phenetic characterization of Citrullus spp. (Cucurbitaceae) and differentiation of egusi-type (C. mucosospermus). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 62: 1159-1179.

10.1007/s10722-015-0220-z
2

Anderson, J. and J. Walker 1962. Histology of watermelon anthracnose. Phytopathology 52:650-653.

3

Andrus, C.F. 1955. New watermelon varieties: Bring new life to that industry. Seed World 4:36-40.

4

Assefa, A.D., O.S. Hur, N.Y. Ro, J.E. Lee, A.J. Hwang, B.S. Kim, J.H. Rhee, J.Y. Yi, J.H. Kim, H.S. Lee, J.S. Sung, M.K. Kim and J.J. Noh. 2020. Fruit morphology, citrulline, and arginine levels in diverse watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) germplasm collections. Plants 9(9):1054.

10.3390/plants909105432824928PMC7569901
5

Boyhan, G.E., J.D. Norton, B.R. Abrahams and H.H. Wen. 1994. A new source of resistance to anthracnose (race 2) in watermelon. Hort. Sci. 29:112-112.

10.21273/HORTSCI.29.2.111
6

Byrd-Masters, L.C. 2018. Sensitivity of Colletotrichum orbiculare isolates in Virginia watermelon to thiophanate-methyl, pyraclostrobin, and prothioconazole. Department of Plant Pathology, Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.

7

Correa, E., K. Crosby and S. Malla. 2021. Optimizing a seedling screening method for anthracnose resistance in watermelon. Plant Health Progress 22(4):536-543.

10.1094/PHP-04-21-0077-RS
8

Dariush, S., M. Darvishnia, A.A. Ebadi, F. Padasht-Dehkaei and E. Bazgir. 2020. Screening rice genotypes for brown spot resistance along with yield attributing characters and its association with morphological traits. J. Crop Prot. 9(3):381-393.

9

Desta, K.T., Y.A. Jeon, M.J. Shin, Y.M. Choi, J. Yi and H. Yoon. 2024. Univariate and multivariate analysis of phenotypic traits in mung beans reveals diversity among Korean, Indian, and Chinese accessions. Korean J. Plant Res. 37(3):270-306.

10

Dutta, S.K., C.V. Hall and E.G. Heyne. 1960. Observations on the physiological races of Colletotrichum lagenarium. Botanical Gazette 121:163-166.

10.1086/336061
11

Egea-Gilabert, C., G. Bilotti, M.E. Requena, M. Ezziyyani, J.M. Vivo-Molina and M.E. Candela. 2008. Pepper morphological traits related with resistance to Phytophthora capsici. Biologia Plantarum 52:105-109.

10.1007/s10535-008-0019-2
12

Egel, D.S. and C. Marchino. 2018. Evaluation of systemic fungicide timing for the control of anthracnose on watermelon, 2017. Plant Dis. Manag. Rep. 12:V049.

13

Elbekkay, M., H. Hamza, M.H. Neily, N. Djebali and A. Ferchichi. 2021. Characterization of watermelon local cultivars from Southern Tunisia using morphological traits and molecular markers. Euphytica 217:1-15.

10.1007/s10681-021-02809-9
14

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2023. Agricultural Production Statistics 2000-2022, FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series No. 79. FAO, Rome, Italy. pp. 9-10.

15

Gichimu, B.M., B.O. Owuor and M.M. Dida. 2008. Assessment of four commercial watermelon cultivars and one local landrace for their response to naturally occurring diseases pests and non-pathogenic disorders in sub-humid tropical conditions. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 3(5 and 6):32-43.

16

Goode, M.J. 1958. Physiological specialization in Colletotrichum lagenarium. Phytopathology 48:79-83.

17

Goode, M.J. and N.N. Winstead. 1957. Variation in pathogenicity of Colletotrichum lagenarium. Phytopathology 47:13.

18

Huh, Y.C., H.S. Choi, I. Solmaz, N. Sari and S. Kim. 2014. Morphological characterization of Korean and Turkish watermelon germplasm. Korean J. Agric. Sci. 41(4):309-314.

10.7744/cnujas.2014.41.4.309
19

Huh, Y.C., K.H. Hong, H.C. Ko, K.S. Park, D.K. Park, J.S. Lee, M.C. Cho, S.Y. Lee, K.D. Ko and W.M. Lee. 2010a. Breeding of a mid-late maturing watermelon cultivar, 'Hanbit' with resistant to anthracnose race 3. Kor. J. Breed. Sci. 42(6):699-702 (in Korean).

20

Huh, Y.C., K.H. Hong, H.C. Ko, K.S. Park, D.K. Park, J.S. Lee, M.C. Cho, S.Y. Lee, K.D. Ko and W.M. Lee. 2010b. Breeding of a mid maturing watermelon cultivar, 'Hangyeol' with resistance to anthracnose race 3. Kor. J. Breed. Sci. 42(6):695-698 (in Korean).

21

Iqbal, A., B. Alam, R. Iqbal, M.A. Binobead, M.S. Elshikh, T. İzgü and T. Ahmed. 2024. Characterization of brown rust resistance in bread wheat using yield related morphological indices. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 1-13.

10.1007/s10722-024-02141-w
22

Jang, Y.J., M. Seo, C.P. Hersh, S.J. Rhee, Y. Kim and G.P. Lee. 2019. An evolutionarily conserved non-synonymous SNP in a leucine-rich repeat domain determines anthracnose resistance in watermelon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132:473-488.

10.1007/s00122-018-3235-y30446794
23

Jenkins, S.F., N.N. Winstead and C.L. McCombs. 1964. Pathogenic comparison of three new and four previously described races of Glomerella angulata var. orbiculare. Plant Dis. Rep. 48:619-623.

24

Keinath, A.P. 2017. Anthracnose. In Keinath, A.P., W.M. Wintermantel and T.A. Zitter. (eds.), Compendium of Cucurbit Diseases and Pests, 2nd ed., The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN (USA). pp. 54-55.

10.1094/9780890545744
25

Keinath, A.P. 2018. Minimizing yield and quality losses in watermelon with multi-site and strobilurin fungicides effective against foliar and fruit anthracnose. Crop Protection 106:72-78.

10.1016/j.cropro.2017.12.012
26

Kiptoo, G.J., M.G. Kinyua, L.G. Matasyoh and O.K. Kiplagat. 2020. Morphological traits associated with anthracnose (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum) resistance in selected common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 14(2):45-56.

10.5897/AJPS2019.1909
27

Layton, D.V. 1937. The Parasitism of Colletotrichum lagenarium (Pass.) Ell. and Halst. Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 223:37-67. Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, Ames, IA, USA.

28

Love, S. and B. Rhodes. 1988. Single gene control of anthracnose resistance in Citrullus? Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 11: 64-67.

29

Matsuo, H., Y. Ishiga, Y. Kubo and Y. Yoshioka. 2022. Colletotrichum orbiculare strains distributed in Japan: race identification and evaluation of virulence to cucurbits. Breeding Science 72(4):306-315.

10.1270/jsbbs.2201136699825PMC9868334
30

Mengistu, G., H. Shimelis, M. Laing, D. Lule and I. Mathew. 2020. Genetic variability among Ethiopian sorghum landrace accessions for major agro-morphological traits and anthracnose resistance. Euphytica 216(7):113.

10.1007/s10681-020-02650-6
31

Patel, T. 2019. Studies on anthracnose resistance in watermelon germplasm. Department of Horticultural Science, Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (USA).

32

Patel, T., L.M. Quesada-Ocampo, T.C. Wehner, B.P. Bhatta, E. Correa and S. Malla. 2023. Recent advances and challenges in management of Colletotrichum orbiculare, the causal agent of watermelon anthracnose. Horticulturae 9:1132.

10.3390/horticulturae9101132
33

Pradeep, M., K. Eraivan Arutkani Aiyanathan, K. Kalpana, M. Shanti and K. Senthil. 2022. Biocontrol potential of endophytic Pseudomonas stutzeri isolated from watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb) against Colletotrichum orbiculare causing anthracnose disease in watermelon. Pest Manag. Hort. Ecosyst. 28:175-182.

10.5958/0974-4541.2022.00019.4
34

Renner, S.S., S. Wu, O.A. Pérez-Escobar, M.V. Silber, Z. Fei and G. Chomicki. 2021. A chromosome-level genome of a Kordofan melon illuminates the origin of domesticated watermelons. PNASU. 118(23):e2101486118.

10.1073/pnas.210148611834031154PMC8201767
35

Rural Development Administration (RDA). 2013. Manual on investigation of characteristics and management of genetic resources: watermelon. RDA, Jeonju, Korea, pp. 28-37 (in Korean).

36

Rural Development Administration (RDA). 2022. Watermelon. RDA, Jeonju, Korea (in Korean).

37

Sahin, N. 2024. Morphological characterization of some local watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) genotypes of Turkey. Int J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. 7(1):28-36.

10.38001/ijlsb.1416465
38

Shim, S.A., K.S. Jang, Y.H. Choi, J.C. Kim, H.T. Kim and G.J. Choi. 2013. Resistance degree of cucurbits cultivars to Colletotrichum orbiculare. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 31(3):371-379 (in Korean).

10.7235/hort.2013.12163
39

Solmaz, I. and N. Sari. 2009. Characterization of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) accessions collected from Turkey for morphological traits. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 56:173-188.

10.1007/s10722-008-9353-7
40

Sowell, G., B.B. Rhodes, Jr. and J.D. Norton. 1980. New sources of resistance to watermelon anthracnose. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105:197-199.

10.21273/JASHS.105.2.197
41

Suvanprakorn, K. and J.D. Norton. 1980. Inheritance of resistance to race 2 anthracnose in watermelon. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105:862-865.

10.21273/JASHS.105.6.862
42

Szamosi, C., I. Solmaz, N. Sari and C. Bársony. 2009. Morphological characterization of Hungarian and Turkish watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. et Nakai) genetic resources. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 56:1091-1105.

10.1007/s10722-009-9432-4
43

Wasilwa, L., J. Correll, T. Morelock and R. McNew. 1993. Reexamination of races of the cucurbit anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum orbiculare. Phytopathology 83:1190-1198.

10.1094/Phyto-83-1190
44

Winstead, N., M. Goode and W. Barham. 1959. Resistance in watermelon to Colletotrichum lagenarium races 1, 2, and 3. Plant Dis. Rep. 43:570-577.

45

Zengin, S., A. Kabas and H. Ilbi. 2020. Relationship between some morphological traits of the tomato lines and resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 48(1):388-397.

10.15835/nbha48111732
페이지 상단으로 이동하기